REVIEW: See Jane Fonda Cradling Some Very Nice-Looking Chickens in Peace, Love & Misunderstanding

Movieline Score:
peacelove_rev

Jane Fonda shows up so infrequently in movies these days that it doesn’t matter if they look potentially good or dismal: Even when the performances (not to mention the movies around them) don’t quite work, Fonda always gives you something to watch. That’s certainly true in Bruce Beresford’s Peace, Love & Misunderstanding, an aimless if good-natured picture that casts Fonda in the role of a Woodstock-dwelling, ugly-art-making hippie-dippie mom who welcomes her estranged and very uptight daughter – played by Catherine Keener – back into her mother-earth arms. Her goal: To get her offspring, and her offspring’s offspring, to loosen up and start getting it on.

What’s that you’re saying? You really don’t want to see Jane Fonda in twirly Grateful Dead skirts and dreadful ethnic earrings, urging the younger folk to get in touch with their inner Alex Comfort? Neither did I. But the more I think about Peace, Love & Misunderstanding, the more I marvel that anyone would even cast Fonda, the most iron-willed of actresses, in this sort of role. None of it quite works, but it seems Beresford did his damnedest to try to pull it off.

As the movie opens, the marriage between rich city people Diane (Keener) and Mark (Kyle MacLachlan) is clearly on the skids. Mark is the kind of guy who proclaims at a dinner party that all of Eugene O’Neill’s plays could easily be cut in half. How anyone could share a bed with this boob, let alone not murder him in his sleep, is beyond me, but Diane is crestfallen when Mark asks her for a divorce. She packs up the couple’s two teenage kids, awkward adolescent Jake (Nat Wolff) and luminous alien child Zoe (Elizabeth Olsen), and heads to her mother’s house upstate – even though, we soon learn, she can’t stand the woman who raised her, a free spirit named Grace (Fonda) who lives on a ramshackle but very expensive bit of hippie real estate adorned with hideous sculptures (which she makes herself, natch) and roaming chickens.

Diane is a high-strung lawyer type who resents her mother for not having given her enough structure, guidance and security while growing up; Grace – who also, incidentally, sells pot on the side - just wants her daughter to chill out. She also doesn’t think it would be a bad idea if Diane got together with the local hottie, a woodworker – yes, ladies, a man who works with his hands! – played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan. But that’s not all: Grace also wants her grandchildren to enjoy the pleasure and freedom of human sexuality, and there are several mildly embarrassing scenes in which she counsels the young ’uns on how to get things cooking with their respective crushes (played by Marissa O’Donnell and the unnervingly good-looking Chace Crawford). If the van’s a rocking', don’t come knockin’.

Grace is the kind of woman who not only keeps chickens, but allows them to wander into the house. It must be said, though, that these are very clean, pretty chickens, and next to Fonda, they were my favorite part of Peace, Love & Misunderstanding. To watch Jane Fonda cradle a speckled puff of tawny feathers, all the while radiating a sort of businesslike affection – well, that’s something to see. But the rest of Peace, Love & Misunderstanding doesn’t go down so easy. The script, by Joseph Muszynski and Christina Mengert, wanders along very familiar trails, and even though Beresford tries to keep things clicking at a reasonable clip, the thing moves like a pair of too-long bell-bottoms dragging in the mud. Keener, an actress who’s usually great fun to watch, can’t seem to muster much enthusiasm for her extremely constrained character, and can you blame her? But again, at least there’s Fonda.

Fonda’s last two movies, Garry Marshall’s 2007 Georgia Rule and Robert Luketic’s 2005 Monster-in-Law, were ridiculous little things, though there’s some faint hope looming ahead in the form of Aaron Sorkin’s upcoming show The Newsroom. Meanwhile, in Peace, Love & Misunderstanding, we need to reckon with the idea of Fonda as a woman who lets it all hang loose – which, as brilliant an actress as Fonda may be (and her radical politics aside), is a pretty big stretch. Still, this stroke of miscasting is fascinating to watch by itself. Fonda isn’t soft enough to play this kind of character, but she wraps herself around the task like an anaconda. When it comes to letting her freak flag fly, she’s damn serious.



Comments

  • JC says:

    By firing Stephanie Zacharek and shutting down the head critic position, Movieline the website is following the path of Movieline the now-defunct printed magazine: dropping substance to make way for glibness and snark. We all know how that worked out. What a shame.

  • Alex says:

    Way to go geniuses, firing your best critic. I'm done reading Movieline.

  • Gaia says:

    Stephanie, you're by far the smartest, most acute critic I've ever come across - you'll be fine, and I'm looking forward to reading you elsewhere. Love from Italy.

  • Brieftaube says:

    Fired? What? Who? Why? When? Really? Seriously, Stephanie has been the reason for me to bookmark this website, because I do enjoy reading her reviews a lot. That would be a big mistake, movieline, if this is true.
    ?
    To the movie with Jane Fonda, I got to say, though, that "Georgia Rule" was very much along the lines of that new one, wasn't it? On a side-remark - I actually liked Lindsay Lohan in it a lot.
    Certainly will go to see the new one, just, like Steph said ... to see a rare appearance of Fonda.

  • JK says:

    Yes, another note about the atrocious decision to fire Stephanie Zacharek, the one reason I came to visit Movieline in the first place, and the reason I won't be visiting it after she leaves.

    I understand it may be expedient in the short term to get rid of "high end" writers and talent (think AMC and "Mad Men") but your decision to let her go is short sighted and will backfire.

    Thus endeth the only sign that Movieline wanted to participate in the rich, worldwide, and historical conversation about film and culture which is the reason we visit these sites in the first place.

    Rest in Peace, quality film writing, you won't be needed at Movieline any longer.

  • test site says:

    I am typically to blogging i genuinely appreciate your posts. This content has really peaks my interest. My goal is to bookmark your website and maintain checking achievable info.

  • Abigail says:

    I believe this web site contains very wonderful pent subject material articles.

  • Anna says:

    Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and enjoy learning more on this subject. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your weblog with more data? It really is extremely helpful for me.

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s