REVIEW: Monte Hellman's Road to Nowhere Gets Lost Along the Way

Movieline Score: 6

Despite its tai chi pace and genre-friendly characters, it's almost impossible to tell what's happening in the intriguing, intractable Road to Nowhere, Two-Lane Blacktop director Monte Hellman's first feature film in 22 years. And yet individual scenes are often languidly decipherable: The film opens with Shannyn Sossamon -- who plays femme fatale Velma Duran in the film proper and Laurel, a first-time actress playing Velma Duran in the eponymous film being made within Road to Nowhere -- painting and blow-drying her nails in real time. Later, we see healthy chunks of films like The Lady Eve and The Seventh Seal, played as part of a director's private tutoring of his ingénue; they're followed by subdued exchanges about their genius. Hellman's placid long shots belie the film's elaborate tease: Big, pretty swaths of film stitched into an increasingly perverse, unresolved design.

Tygh Runyan plays Mitchell Haven, a Hollywood gun making a true-crime film about a high-level financial scheme that ended in murder and the disappearance and possible suicide of Duran. A young blogger (Dominique Swain) familiar with the case and an insurance investigator (Waylon Payne) sniff around the set and then around each other, the latter fixed on his suspicion that the film's star might also be the missing Duran. Laurel protests her lack of acting ability, but all Haven needs is for her to be her silky, kittenish self, radiating the allure that may be more organic to his story than he imagines. Sassomon, a soulful gamine who hasn't developed the presence to hold down a part that's both as archetypal and ephemeral as this one, feels like an aughts-era indie's feeble answer to the femme fatale, which is fitting enough. As the director's stand-in, Runyan presents a more serious problem: Thick-smiled, Caesar-topped, and given to hushed sincerity, his Mitchell might make a decent life coach. But ascribing the energy and arrogance of authorial vision to a character this benign feels like a bad move for both pictures and all of the narrative fragments floating between them.

Big names -- Leo, Scarlett -- are parachuted into early scenes, and Haven appears in an interview with Variety's Peter Bart (the movie's screenwriter, Steven Gaydos, is the executive editor of that publication). These gestures confuse the already overlayered planes of reality and representation with a passing bid for behind-the-scenes credibility. This is not that kind of film. And yet the scenes that focus on the moviemaking grind -- from courting an actress to running lines to cringing over dailies -- are the most compelling. Road to Nowhere was one of the first films shot on the Canon 5D Mark II camera, and Haven makes it his weapon of choice as well. Its mention is a typical refraction: "Do you feel rusty in any way?" Bart asks Haven. Hellman has said that the suicide of his Two-Lane Blacktop star and lover Laurie Bird informed Road to Nowhere, and this is a film that works best when wandering through a hall-of-mirrors, personally invested world of independent filmmaking.

The central plot, perforated with "Which film am I watching?" rabbit holes, grows wearying by the one-hour mark; the scenes have no continuity, but more importantly no collaborative pull. Each clever turn feels like a revolution away from greater understanding, part of a daring game that goes on too long for interest in the outcome -- and, more fatally, in the characters -- to last.



Comments

  • Tommy Marx says:

    Michelle, I don't care for your movie reviews. With all due respect, you try so hard it's off-putting. I love when critics use their personal experiences and opinions to make the review more than just a standard rehash of the plot and such. But every time I read one of your reviews, it feels like you spend hours searching for words in a Thesaurus. Your reviews don't flow as much as they intimidate.
    Although this is a mean comment, I really wish it wasn't. I've never met you, you are obviously intelligent and a talented writer, but I can't help but feel like you try much too hard. That makes reading your thoughts more difficult than it should be. Stephanie manages to write intelligent, thought-provoking reviews that - whether or not I agree with them (often I do) - I enjoy reading.
    Please forgive me for being a jerk. I think you could be an excellent critic. But you need to trust your heart a little more and your expansive vocabulary a little less. One of the reasons I've always loved Stephen King is because he believes the story is more important than the author. I don't believe you think you're more important than the movies you're reviewing, but I do think far too often you use words not to illustrate a point but to show how extremely intelligent you are.
    I really look forward to when you are a little more comfortable with your voice. And by the way, I couldn't write a review 25% as good as yours, so I know how difficult it is. I just wanted to say you don't need to try quite so hard. Trust yourself a little bit more.
    Thus ends the Oprah portion of our program. I apologize if I offended you in any way.

  • John says:

    Michelle: For the very important (to us) historical record, ROAD TO NOWHERE was not, as you assert above, "one of the first films shot on the Canon 5D Mark II camera, but rather THE FIRST feature film to be made with this technology.
    We're extremely proud of the distinction and it's what led the New York Times to write that we could be "as important to the history of indie films as 'Avatar' is to popcorn films" because once again, director Monte Hellman is at the forefront of American cinema, both stylistically and technologically. Thanks for viewing and reviewing! Steven Gaydos, writer/producer, ROAD TO NOWHERE

  • Gary Glasser says:

    Wearying by the first hour? How about wearying by the first 5 minutes of watching (painted) nails dry? I love all Monte Hellman's older stuff, but this was just so hard to stay awake to...
    there may be some significance and innovation, but overall not a great movie experience in my humble opinion...but I sat through it and it had some moments and excellent casting and cinematography, I freely admit. I wanted to love it, I really did.

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s