REVIEW: Is Inception This Year's Masterpiece? Dream On

Movieline Score: 3

inception_rev_2.jpg

Luckily, Cobb's replacement architect, an earnest young student named Ariadne (Ellen Page), is more on the ball, and she senses that Cobb has some dark, painful secret buried deep in the basement of his subconscious. (Later, Nolan will show us an actual elevator going down into that basement, to reinforce the metaphor.) Cobb's secret has something to do with those two little blond kids we keep seeing in his subconscious and his extremely pissed-off wife, Mal (Marion Cotillard), who haunts his dreams dressed mostly in an assortment of evening gowns. Cobb's personal trauma has become intertwined with his latest assignment: A onetime mark who has become an associate (or something -- the relationship is never made clear), Saito (Ken Watanabe), has suggested that Cobb may find a way back to his wife and family, if only he can penetrate the dreams of a young man, Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy), who's just inherited his father's business empire.

That "way back" can be summed up in one word -- Inception! -- which is incanted again and again, like the name of a Calvin Klein perfume. (Every time Cobb hears it, his ears perk up like a Doberman's.) Inception is even more pretentious and overstuffed than Nolan's last picture, The Dark Knight, a feat I'd not have thought possible. It also shows the same lack of regard for visual logic. (I'm still waiting for someone to tell me how Heath Ledger's Joker got off that building ledge, which is where we last saw him.)

But Nolan serves up great visuals, you say. Just look at that folded-up, upside-down Paris, all those fantastic slow-motion explosions, the way that van takes 1,762 seconds to veer off a bridge and into the water. It's all so cool, right? But that's not the same as arranging those images coherently so that the viewer always knows who's coming from where, and why. In the movie's climactic scene -- or, rather, one of its numerous climactic dream-within-a-dream scenes -- a character gets chased around a snowy mountain by guys with automatic weapons. Who are they, and where did they come from? There are other characters on that mountain, too, but we have no idea where they are, or what they're doing in relation to one another.

Because Nolan can't connect his visuals, he has to use words, and lots of them, to let us know what characters are doing and why we should care. Every scene is packed with helpful explanatory dialogue like "Killing him would just wake him up" and "Pain is in the mind." "A closed loop will help you control the levels of the dream you create," one character explains matter-of-factly to another, and she responds as if she's just heard the music of the spheres. There's more: "As we go deeper into Fischer, we're also going deeper into you. And I'm not sure we're going to like what we find." (Don't go in the basement.) You'll find one instance of the ever-popular "Trust me -- he's hiding something, and we need to find out what it is." I hope you're not too shocked to learn that "She had herself declared sane by three different psychologists." And last but not least, pay close attention to this pithy solution to a grave problem: "As soon as Arthur's music kicks in, just revive him with the defibrillator." Of course! Why didn't I think of that?

When Nolan fears things might be getting a little slow, he pumps up the Zimmermusik, much of which sounds derivative of old James Bond scores, only bigger, louder and less melodic. This isn't an actors' movie: None of Nolan's movies are -- the most they demand are stunts and gimmicks, or at best a constipated expression that suggests a character is suffering deeply repressed pain. DiCaprio is pretty good at wearing that expression here, but he's not called upon to do much else. And Levitt, a versatile performer who's always interesting to watch, is completely wasted in a colorless role. Similarly, Page is required to do little more than blink her enormous eyes, like a carnival Kewpie. And Michael Caine's appearance is so brief, he may as well be a mirage in this vast desert.

Inception is nice enough to look at; the DP is Wally Pfister, who frequently collaborates with Nolan, and he makes those Parisian streets, in particular, look very pretty and bright. But the deeper you get into the movie, the more its polished visual surface feels like a deception. Nearly every moment in Inception is so big, so fattened-up, that nothing has any weight; because every little thing is of the gravest importance, there's nothing at stake. Nolan keeps the story whirring, all right -- he's the man behind the curtain, feverishly pushing levers and operating dials. He uses his figurative bullhorn to ask allegedly deep questions, like "What's real, and what's illusion?" (He's the Doug Henning of filmmakers.) But although Inception gives the appearance of being a work of intelligence and complexity, it's really just an ungodly tangle. There's no elegance in Nolan's vision, only sweat. He's the dream architect who thinks he's doing us a favor by giving us a shag rug.

Pages: 1 2



Comments

  • Simon says:

    hahahahahaha! thank you. I was having boring night. However your review has provided the most hilarious attempt to get noticed I've ever read.
    If I'm off the mark. Please don't hold it against me. Though that only leave us with two other plausible alternatives. The first is that I'm wrong (unlikely) and the other is that you're a blind, deaf, mute. Who while aimlessly bashing away at a keyboard has somehow, impressively, managed to construct complete (however full of arse gravy) sentences. Well if you give enough monkeys type writers, you hear them say.

  • Kyle says:

    Like my dad says: 'don't waste time arguing with ignorants'. So, I'm writing for those who might read this review. Everyone has the right to like or dislike something, and even give their opinion. It is only a matter on what their opinion is based on, so we may consider it a valid opinion or not. So here is my question: Do you think about considering the opinion of someone who claims that Nolan's movies are not actor's movies, when he gave us a remarkable Joker with rather different moral standards, great quotes, that I did not have to remind you but still am going to, was beautifully played by HL, who won an Oscar ? Honestly...

  • Evan says:

    This movie is like The Emperor has no clothes...plus anything with Joeseph Gordon Levitt is awful to begin with.

  • Dan says:

    Nolan fanboys suck dick for bus fare. Then walk home.

  • Dag Eustice says:

    What an utter retarded review. This is why people don't like critics. Stephanie, don't take this personally, but I think you are the one that should overthink this review, not Nolan.

  • Mal says:

    I bet you're fun at parties.

  • AlmostJesus says:

    Giving bad review just to get clicks is cheapest way to get clicks.

  • Jennifer says:

    No, but I do wonder if the reviewer even really watched the movie.

    "A onetime mark who has become an associate (or something -- the relationship is never made clear), Saito (Ken Watanabe), has suggested that Cobb may find a way back to his wife and family, if only he can penetrate the dreams of a young man, Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy), who's just inherited his father's business empire."

    Two points: 1) Penetrating the dreams of Cillian Murphy's character is not the job; it is only the means to getting the job done. 2) Cobb is trying to get back to his family, but only to his children as his wife is dead.

    I'm not saying the movie isn't without flaws. It has flaws. But watch the movie. Be informed. Have an intelligent argument, not just paragraphs about how bad it was.

  • batmanadk says:

    It seems like this guy was too dumb to understand the movie... It is like when you show Bach to an ignorant that only listens to the simplest form of music (comercial pop hits), of course the ignorants wont understand Bach's genius, as this guy won't understand Nolan's

  • It was explained that fisher had his mind trained to fight against people like Cobb who extract information From the mind. The reason there are a lot of special effects and stunts is so that there is an emphasis that dreams are limitless. The only reason you thing it is a tangle is because you don’t understand what’s happening. You sound like an old person saying that just because you don’t understand the movie, it is terrible