Is This the Greatest Movie Publicity Still Ever?

Ladies and gentlemen, Peter Dinklage in Death at a Funeral. Toss in a positive review, and suddenly this is a must-see. [IMDB]



Comments

  • The Winchester says:

    Yes.
    Yes it is.

  • Furious D says:

    That should have been the film's poster.
    In fact, it should be every film's poster.

  • Martini Shark says:

    I had that exact vision one afternoon during a fever-dream when I nodded off after a double serving of jalepeno poppers and half a bottle of aquavit.
    I want royalties.

  • happygolucky says:

    I wish to join the chorus.

  • favonik says:

    GREAT !!!!

  • Huzzah? says:

    Am I missing something? How does something like this get Dugg?

  • Flem says:

    The remake is a "shouldn't-have-happened" what's wrong with the original? They were speaking english.

  • Jamin says:

    This movie doesn't need a remake. The British version is awesome. Nobody does dark comedy like the Brits.

  • Kenn says:

    Wait, did they really cast him in the same role? What, did no one else want to play the dwarf gay-lover extortionist character?

  • Ben Branch says:

    Not sure what was wrong with the original but there does seem to be a startling number of Brit films and tv shows being re-created in the US. I'm yet to see one that even comes close to the original. And this is coming from an American.

  • Zing Yoo says:

    LOL, you have to admit that is pretty funny stuff.
    Lou
    http://www.security-tools.us.tc

  • tig says:

    This post is suspiciously to ask - S.T. VanAirsdale, are working for this film?

  • tig says:

    This post is suspiciously enough to ask - S.T. VanAirsdale, are you working for this film?

  • Booger says:

    I don't have the slightest idea what this article (and I use the word "article" loosely)is about. Probably like most articles on the Net, it is empty pap fed to the masses.

  • Cindy Knobchewer says:

    I've seen this photo before. It was issued by Reuters in September, 2005. It is entitled "Cute Little Dwarf Being Reamed By A Dead Person".

  • MyName says:

    NO. No, it is not.

  • No! Great idea, though. Should I request a cut of the back-end?

  • Gosh! You are persistent. Nope, still not working for them.

  • Perro Insano says:

    No. No it's not the best.
    In fact, I don't think I'd even put it in the top ten greatest movie publicity stills. It's just not very good.
    Good try though.

  • Perro Insano says:

    No. Of course you're not working for them.
    But you are looking for a job, right?

  • gerry says:

    It's a shame that the "american ego" of the film industry won't accept that the "original british version" is good enough. No need for a remake.

  • Irma Snitwhistle says:

    THAT DWARF WEARS PAMPERS BECAUSE HE HAS PROBLEMS WITH INCONTINENCE. I ACTUALLY BID ON A PAIR OF HIS SOILED DIAPERS ON EBAY, BUT I WAS OUTBID BY DONALD TRUMP.

  • Edgar Picklepuss says:

    I read where this guy in the photo was actually Ed Mcmahon's lover during the period when Mcmahon and Johnny Carson were in their copraphage period; Johnny, Ed and the dwarf held private feces- feasting events in the dressing room on the Tonight Show set. I also heard Jay Leno became involved but couldn't take the emotional distress cause by the dwarf's behavior, considering they together had a hard-core, face-into-butt relationship, and Jay had become fecally possessive.

  • rich says:

    original is laugh out loud funny....totally unexpected when had a look