Brothers Isn't a War Movie. Just Ask Jake Gyllenhaal.

Brothers is many things: a family drama, a study of grief, an exploration of the darkest reaches of human nature, and a remake. One thing it isn't? A war movie. At least according to the people who made it.

"Obviously a big part of the movie is the war," producer Ryan Kavanaugh told Movieline, "but we don't really see it as a war movie, per se." Is this a clever marketing ploy on Kavanaugh's part? A sly verbal manipulation to distance it from previous box office failures? Kavanaugh admits to dabbling previously in what one might call "categorically lax" marketing tactics. "I made a movie called 3:10 to Yuma," he admits, "which we called an 'adventure thriller.'" One can only wonder what kind of semantic slight of hand Kavanaugh could apply to Brothers. Sibling conflict drama? Romantic psycho-dramedy?

From a marketing standpoint, Brothers seems to suffer from an identity crisis. Previews presumably geared toward the Danielle Steele crowd hype the domestic-triangle dispute, essentially underselling what is a far more intriguing situation. The previews may flash "lust" and "betrayal" in red caps against a black screen and atonal piano music -- but Brothers isn't a romantic drama, either. Still, that's not the term causing involuntary convulsions in its producers.

"If you replace Afghanistan and the war with any situation" for main character Sam Cahill to endure, Kavanaugh told us, "it could be anywhere, any turmoil, it could be a kidnapping, anything -- I don't think it changes the essence of the movie." And it's not just Kavanaugh that dislikes the association. "It's funny that people are saying this is some kind of war movie," says Jake Gyllenhaal, who plays emotionally bruised ex-con brother Tommy Cahill. "It is intertwined with a lot of other complications," he concedes -- those complications presumably being Sam Cahill's life-altering torture in Afghanistan during the, uh, war -- "but mostly it's about what this man does to get back to the people that he loves and to his life."

But Gyllenhaal isn't wrong. Brothers focuses more on the psychological journey of an individual soldier than the structure of military conflict. You could say Brothers reverses the standard war movie formula by featuring the war in the soldier rather than the soldier in the war, and for that reason alone it does deserve some degree of differentiation. But it also begs the larger question: Has the term "war movie" become a bad word?

Feature film nomenclature is a grossly inexact science, with categories based on approximate accuracy and a blanketing impact that can swallow the thematic nuances of a film. What we think of as "war movies" carry the cumbersome associations of politics, guilt, and that much-dreaded Hollywood buzzkill: reality. The Brothers team wants to preempt the tide, rightly or wrongly, if only to preserve what is a highly sophisticated character study that happens to be profoundly informed by war.

"A lot of our foreign distributor partners, domestic partners, and everybody involved I think saw past the normal war issues," Kavanaugh said. "And they saw that something magical could be created by putting all these people together."

Director Jim Sheridan took a different, if more direct approach to the question: "I think there's a denial that there's a war going on at all," he said.


  • NP says:

    3 overrated actors is the way I instinctively want to describe this movie.

  • Furious D says:

    Brothers isn't a war movie.
    It also isn't a movie that's going to make money.

  • Inigo Montoya says:

    I'm just glad Hollywood is finally addressing the War on Terror's effects on the Twink population.

  • plez says:

    The poster has a Brokeback mountain feel to it.

  • Daft Clown says:

    I could go with Tobey Maguire being a twink, but Jake definitely runs with the cub set.

  • leah48 says:

    I don't know about some of these responses--this movie looks pretty amazing and I've seeing positive reviews all over the net. Here's another review I just read: "Thought the film was superb; also mentioned it was a great film that came out of nowhere, he felt. Thinks these are 3 of the best actors out there".

  • madisonhack says:

    I just saw this film. By tomorrow I'll probably feel differently about it, but now I would have to call this a "must-see" for lots of reasons. The acting was phenomenal, the story was pretty tight, and the script deserves mention for the Academy Awards, as does other aspects of the film. To say this is not a war movie is like saying that "Mystic River" isn't about child abuse. Both statements are true, but neither film would be the same without those elements.

  • Jeanne Duffy says:

    I just watched the movie. I was surprised that I hadn't heard of it before, and I was impressed with it on many levels. In my opinion, the character of the dad and of Grace were somewhat two-dimensional, but that didn't detract from the power of the movie. I would not call it a "war movie," per se, but getting bogged down in how to categorize it misses the point. There is a universal quality to it that speaks to the effects of war and the profound impact and indescribable changes that it can have on a human being. The term "post-traumatic stress disorder" has been batted around so frequently that it has almost become a cliche. This movie made me realize that there are many soldiers and marines in our society who have experienced things that are indescribable to those who haven't been to combat zones, not necessarily to the degree depicted in the movie, but life-altering, just the same. The contrast between a society that values life vs. the cultures which have no regard for it, the effects of being thrust into a situation in which everything that a person has been taught is discarded appears to me to be the central theme of the movie, and in that respect I suppose this could be called a "war movie." I thought the acting was superb. The movie will stick with me for a long time.

  • Florencia says:

    I want too to thank you for this great read!! I absolutely lovsd every bit of
    it. I have got you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post…

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s