NPR's Hypocrisy: Outrage Review Censored, Gay Idol Speculation OK
Outrage is a provocative documentary that names closeted politicians, but was it too hot for NPR to handle? Indiewire broke the story today that NPR has censored critic Nathan Lee's review of the film, scrubbing it of references to Larry Craig and Charlie Crist, two of the politicians profiled in the movie. (What's more, Lee lodged a complaint in the comments section of the review that was also removed by NPR higher-ups.) "NPR has a long-held policy of trying to respect the privacy of public figures and of not airing or publishing rumors, allegations and reports about their private lives unless there is a compelling reason to do so," Dick Meyer, NPR's executive director of Digital, told Indiewire.
We love blanket statements like those, because they're so easy to disprove! Naturally, we found plenty of evidence that NPR is willing to speculate on the sexuality of public figures -- especially when those figures are entertainers instead of influential Republican politicians.
In the last month, NPR was all too happy to run an editorial about the sexuality of American Idol frontrunner Adam Lambert, wherein writer Linda Holmes snarks on the media outlets that are reticent to fully acknowledge what she presumes is Lambert's homosexuality. And this past November, after comedian Wanda Sykes came out as a lesbian at a gay rights rally in Las Vegas, NPR spent minutes of airtime discussing whether it would lead Queen Latifah (who's never publicly stated that she is a lesbian) to do the same.
So what interpretation of its own ethics policy allowed NPR to air and publish rumors in those cases? Fresh Air host Terry Gross nearly had an on-air coronary when Outrage director Kirby Dick mentioned the allegations about Larry Craig on her show, demurring that since she couldn't personally fact-check his sources, she'd rather him not name names on NPR airtime. And yet, NPR's "sources" in its other gay-speculative items seem rather flimsy: some boy-kissing photos for Lambert (and, y'know, a working gaydar), and an item from the super-unreliable MediaTakeOut.com for Latifah. In what world are those fair game for speculation, yet Craig's arrest for homosexual lewd conduct in a men's restroom isn't?
The entire premise of Outrage is that outing closeted politicians is necessary when they have strongly anti-gay voting records, and that the mainstream media is too timid to acknowledge this. It's clear from NPR's conduct that even if they don't agree with the first part of Dick's thesis, they can't help themselves from proving the latter.
· "Outrage" Review Spiked for Naming Names [Indiewire]
Subscribe to the new Movieline on YouTube
Comments
I'm just laughing at the name Dick Meyer.
Hmm, well, lack of concrete evidence didn't stop anyone from calling me a fag in high school. I guess I should've just pretended I was a Republican congressman and no one would've been the wiser!
All arguments aside, does NPR realize they are being implicitly homophobic by taking this hardline approach?
NPR gets its funding from Congress so it doesn't want to piss off the people who could veto/reduce their annual funding. It's a simple matter of NPR not biting the hand that feeds it. Unfortunate, yes. Cowardly? Definitely.
Not to mention that gay Congressmen passing discriminatory laws that limit the freedoms, the employability, and the health of gays and lesbians is DEFINITELY a "compelling reason to do so"!
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME.
Where did the REAL NPR go?
And there goes a lot of gay $$$ out the window, NPR.
Hold on. I have been listening to NPR before some of you were born.
I have complete faith they will bring this issue to full discussion with
their listening audience. If not, it will be the end of my support, and
it will be withheld with a very wounded heart.
Ye olde double-standard.
NPR reports again without names (which pissed me off): http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104196355, but then, what is the deal here? The movie names a total of three congressman (the NPR story is about Washington), according to the LA Times, http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-cause8-2009may08,0,6665296.story. They are: California Rep. David Dreier, ex-Louisiana Congressman Jim McCrery, and ex-Idaho Sen. Larry Craig.
Three. This is a story? This is the reason for a movie? This is a reason for Outrage? This is a reason for NPR to even care?
So where are the conservative posts? Looks like you want opinions as long as they are the same as your own. Some would call you biased censors, I call you something else.
NPR only gets about 10% of its budget from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and not 'from Congress'. In fact, the GOP members of Congress have been attacking the CPB and NPR and PBS for years, trying to kill them off by killing their funding. NPR gets its money from me. Any outrage I have over this story is not in their refusal to name political names in these instances, but rather that they feel it's OK to treat entertainers with less respect.
NPR is a grossly biased organization.
For instance NPR has an inordinately large commitment to promoting gay and same sex marriage despite the gays representing less than one percent of the population. There are more native Americans who have endured more persecution than the gays. Where are the pro native American stories? There are none because NPR will not hire native Americans.
I was watching CSpan one morning and there was a group from NPR in a small chamber on capitol hill petitioning a committee for 1.4 Billion dollars of tax-payer money for capital improvements.