Clerical Errors

Do the men who make movies about men of the cloth ever wonder if God is watching? We asked Joe Queenan to judge whether the producers of trash like Monsignor, Last Rites and We're No Angels will burn in hell.

________________________________

For centuries, Catholic theologians have vainly striven to solve two seemingly unfathomable mysteries: How is it possible to reconcile the existence of a merciful, loving God with the existence of people like Mickey Rourke; and, if God is truly All-Knowing and All-Powerful, an omnipotent force who can make the oceans swell and the mountains tremble, why doesn't He do something about Daphne Zuniga? More to the point, why does He tolerate anyone who makes movies such as Last Rites, Exorcist II: The Herectic, A Prayer for the Dying and Monsignor--all of which deal contemptuously with the religion His Well-Beloved Son shed His Most Precious Blood to establish? This is, after all, His universe. It's not like He has to put up with this stuff.

The complete answer to these questions is too convoluted to go into here, so let's just put it this way: God doesn't enjoy movies like Last Rites and The Pope Must Diet any more than the rest of us. But since the Fall of Man, or so Catholics believe, God has endowed all of His human creations with free will and has allowed them to determine their own destinies. For some, this means acting in, directing, scripting, being a gaffer for the second technical unit of or paying to see movies about Catholic priests. People such as this can live rich, productive, morally upstanding lives, trying to make the best of the tools God has given them, and either participate in or shell out their hard-earned money to see movies like Going My Way and The Bells of St. Mary's. Or, they can become the tools of Satan and waste their lives in charnel houses, fleshpots, brothels and business schools, producing, directing or going to see movies like Last Rites and The Exorcist III. God has made the choice very clear: You can spend your time watching wholesome, upbeat, life-affirming films, and at the end of your days I will sit you at my right hand, just a few seats from John Hughes and Ronnie Howard. Or you can spend your life watching libidinous, perverse films, and at the end of your days I will cast you into the very deepest pit of hell. (The very deepest pit of hell, or course, is the first left past Renny Harlin's house.)

The most important thing to remember when dealing with films featuring Catholic priests is that there are limits to God's power, even if He is, officially, omnipotent. Not even an omnipotent creature who has ruled all of creation since the beginning of time can teach Christopher Reeve how to act. Not even the most powerful being in the universe can breathe any pep into Jason Miller. And once an implacable force of nature like Richard Burton or Robert De Niro or Sean Penn has made up his mind that he is going to wreck a film, no power in the cosmos can stand in his way.

The purpose of this article is to determine precisely which film about priests is most offensive in the eyes of God--which film has won for its producer, director, stars, best boy, etc., the longest and most terrifying sojourn in the Inferno. I do this not out of some personal sense of outrage at immoral, Catholic-bashing slime such as Monsignor and Last Rites, but in direct response to voluminous inquiries from Movieline readers demanding to know why the magazine doesn't run more stories dealing with the Sixth and Ninth Commandments, and, of course, the Seven Deadly Sins.

But first, some history. Movies about priests first came to prominence during the 1930s and 1940s, when such sturdy offerings as Angels With Dirty Faces and Fighting Father Dunne were box-office favorites. These films had three common characteristics: they all starred Pat O'Brien as a crusading priest, they all celebrated the triumph of good over evil, and not for a single moment did anyone even faintly resembling Daphne Zuniga or Genevieve Bujold offer to roll in the hay with anyone wearing a Roman collar.

These movies were succeeded by charming Bing Crosby vehicles such as Going My Way and The Bells of St. Mary's (Going My Way II), in which the low-key crooner tried to hold his own against the radiant Ingrid Bergman, the most beautiful movie star of them all, who upon her death was immediately assumed into heaven, Roberto Rossellini or no Roberto Rossellini. These movies bore little or no relation to what professionals call "reality," but then again, neither does heaven.

At the same time, Gregory Peck was starring in slightly weightier films such as Keys of the Kingdom, and pious chaplains were turning up in war movies all over the place. These films were made by people who did not think religion was impossibly stupid or who, if they did, kept their opinions to themselves. This is even true of Alfred Hitchcock's 1953 I Confess, which deals with a somewhat dim priest (Montgomery Clift) who cannot divulge the identity of a murderer to the police because the murderer has confessed the crime in the confessional--even though this means that the priest himself may be framed for the crime. Hitchcock may have felt that this seal-of-confession business was hopeless rigmarole, but this does not come across in the film. What does come across in the film is that Hitchcock can really use a camera and that even in black-and-white, Karl Malden has the biggest nose in Quebec.

Things started to change during the 1960s, as movies about priests became grittier and less deferential. The Hoodlum Priest (1961) dealt with the efforts of street-smart cleric Don Murray to save the soul of teenage hood Keir Dullea, literally a bad actor playing a bad actor. The Cardinal (1963), an interminable Otto Premingeriatricism, featured an actor, Tom Tryon (who had once played a TV character named Texas Ranger John Slaughter), playing a priest who falls in love with a hot little number played by Romy Schneider (which raises the question of whether Romy was the real-life mother of actress Maria, who was later buggered by Marlon Brando in Last Tango in Paris and forced to appear in a Michelangelo Antonioni movie, both of which could then be explained away as divine retribution visited on the innocent child for the sin of her parent: appearing in a movie as bad as The Cardinal).

The year 1964 witnessed the making of the greatest priest film ever--Becket--which concerns the spiritual apotheosis of a lecher and rake, played by Richard Burton, after he is named Archbishop of Canterbury by his lecherous, rakish chum, the King of England, played by Peter O'Toole (obviously, it wouldn't have been too hard for Burton and O'Toole to switch roles). Seven years later, Ken Russell released his refreshingly depraved The Devils, a Hieronymus Bosch painting come to life, featuring all-purpose knave Oliver Reed as a priest and veteran space creature Vanessa Redgrave as a nun. This type of casting is right up there with Charlotte Rampling as a marine biologist in Orca, Sigourney Weaver as an expert on Middle Eastern history in Half Moon Street and Diane Keaton as anyone in anything.

Since Becket and The Devils, we have fallen on hard times. In fact, with the exception of the intelligent, moving True Confessions, the cheerfully revolting The Exorcist, and such well-meaning but overwrought offerings as Mass Appeal and Romero, it's been straight downhill. We have had knuckleheadisms such as The Rosary Murders and The Shoes of the Fisherman, sadistic trash such as Last Rites, A Prayer for the Dying and the Exorcist sequels, and idiotic comedies such as We're No Angels and The Pope Must Diet. What we have had is a steady diet of bad-priest movies.

There are three basic types of bad-priest movies: the priest-as-imposter picture, the seal-of-confession picture and the Mafia-priest picture. (There is often a good deal of overlap, too: Last Rites is both a seal-of-confession and a Mafia-priest picture.) The priest-as-imposter picture features a bum, hired killer or fuck-knuckle who disguises himself as a cleric and suddenly finds himself suffused with inexhaustible supplies of piety and goodness--just like Sinead O'Connor. The genre originated with The Left Hand of God, the 1955 film starring Humphrey Bogart which is set in the Mysterious East, evolved further in Guns for San Sebastian, the 1968 Anthony Quinn film set in the Wild West, and culminated in We're No Angels, the 1989 Robert De Niro-Sean Penn film, set in Buffalo or Canada or something--which is itself a remake of, yes, an old Bogart film.

The Mafia-priest picture deals with attempts by sinister forces whose names end in a vowel to take control of the already debauched Catholic Church. The first--and most ghastly--film of this sort is Monsignor, a 1982 abomination so ferociously anti-Catholic one suspects that Satan Himself had something to do with it. But no, it was not Satan; it was Frank Yablans. Monsignor stars the abysmal Christopher Reeve, features a score by the useless John Williams and has a supporting cast headed by full-service ham Fernando Rey. The movie deals with the villainy of Reeve, the Vatican business manager, who does business with the Mafia and nearly brings the Church crashing down around him-- not that Frank Yablans would care. In this sense, Monsignor is a little bit like Last Rites, which deals with a priest whose dad is a Mafia don. And it's also just a teensy-weensy bit like The Godfather, Part III, which deals with a Vatican banker who does business with the Mafia. And, yes, it does bear ever so slight a resemblance to The Pope Must Diet, which deals with a Cardinal who is in league with the Mafia.

An unsophisticated viewer might have a hard time telling some of these movies apart. Each of these movies makes Italians seem vicious and Catholic clergymen seem beastly. Each of these movies has a central character played by an actor or actress who cannot act: Christopher Reeve, Tom Berenger, Sofia Coppola, Robbie Coltrane. Each of these movies involves a Mafia hit man. How, then, to tell them apart? The handiest way is by remembering which illicit sexual act the characters engage in during the movie. Last Rites is the one where the priest sleeps with his sister, who is a hit woman, as well as with a Mexican whore. The Pope Must Diet is the one where the priest sleeps with the mother of a dead British rock star. Monsignor is the one where the priest sleeps with a French nun. And Godfather III is the one where the priest doesn't sleep with anyone. Godfather III is the one where the Mafia hit man sleeps with his first cousin, who should have been Winona Ryder, but ended up being the director's daughter, a certifiable non-fox.

I hope all of this has been helpful.

Just as mob-priest pictures seem to overlap at certain points, seal-of-confession pictures all seem to run together. Ever since Montgomery Clift clammed up about the killer's identity in I Confess, Hollywood has been going back to this particular well again and again and again. In The Rosary Murders, inexplicably set in Detroit, a serial killer confesses his crimes to Donald Sutherland, who is bound by the seal of confession not to reveal his identity to the police. In Last Rites, Tom Berenger's hit sister confesses that she murdered her husband, but Berenger is bound by the seal of confession not to reveal her identity to the cops. (Berenger, of course, has other reasons for keeping a lid on it; he was banging sis when he was just 15.) In True Confessions, all-around lowlife Charles Durning tells Robert De Niro that he was banging a murdered, mutilated playgirl, but De Niro cannot report this to his cop brother because of the seal of confession. (De Niro, of course, has other reasons for keeping a lid on it; he also knows the murdered, mutilated girl.) In Exorcist III, Satan himself confesses his sins to a priest, who cannot reveal his identity to the police because of the seal of confession, and also because Satan rips his head off. In Monsignor, scumbag mobster Jason Miller confesses his sins to scumbag priest Christopher Reeve, who cannot divulge his crimes because of the seal of confession. (Reeve, of course, has other reasons for not divulging his crimes to the cops, because the penitent scumbag happens to be his partner in crime.) Finally, in A Prayer for the Dying, a low-life, gun-toting, child-murdering, IRA psychopath played by Mickey Rourke (the role was a real stretch for Mickey) confesses to a murder in Father Bob Hoskins's confessional after Hoskins has seen him commit the crime.

Pages: 1 2



Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s