'Star Trek Into Darkness': Cumberbatch's Identity, Carol Marcus, And A New 'Trek' Villain Theory

Star Trek Into Darkness Cumberbatch

Alice Eve is... Carol Marcus
Forget Benedict Cumberbatch and Klingon intrigue; it was revealed that Alice Eve is playing Carol Marcus, and that opens a very specific door into the past of Star Trek lore — specifically, The Wrath of Khan.

In 1982's The Wrath of Khan, Marcus (played by Bibi Besch) is the molecular biologist who shares a past and a grown son with Kirk. She creates the Genesis Device, which is stolen by Khan Noonien Singh (Ricardo Montalban); later, her son is killed by Klingons.

The Marcus of STID is younger than she is in Wrath of Khan, of course, so Abrams' film will catch her at an earlier point in her story, according to Eve. And while there was no sign of a Genesis Device in any of the Star Trek Into Darkness preview materials, the opening nine minutes do feature Spock using a volcano deactivator, which houses three colored cubes of chemical compounds and a power source in a handheld case, and which can be used to neutralize an erupting volcano by creating an opposite effect — a freezing reaction.

Is STID merely setting up the Khan storyline to come, maybe one or two movies down the line? Have Abrams, Damon Lindelof, Alex Kurtzman, and Bob Orci taken character and plot threads from throughout Trek canon to create a new twist on a familiar character in Harrison?

Star Trek Into Darkness HarrimanI'll leave you with this: Speaking with Eve on the rooftop of Bad Robot, I was impressed when she directly quoted the Star Trek: TOS episode "Charlie X." (It precedes "Where No Man Has Gone Before," AKA the Gary Mitchell episode of ST: TOS.) In it, "Charlie X" is Charlie Evans, a young man the Enterprise rescues from his solitary life on the planet Thasus who has been given godlike powers.

"Charlie X" meets the Gary Mitchell storyline in the (non-canon) fan mini-series Star Trek: Of Gods and Men, which envisions an older, vengeful Charlie taking revenge on Kirk by going back in time to effectively kill him, creating an alternate timeline in which Mitchell has taken over the galaxy with the help of the alternate timeline version of another canon Trek character: Starfleet captain John Harriman.

Harriman... Harrison... Harriman... Harrison...

If we're talking canon (from which Cumberbatch's character is supposedly taken), Harriman appeared in Star Trek: Generations, played by Alan Ruck; he's the captain of the Enterprise-B and the man responsible for Kirk's eventual demise. The wild theorizing ends there, alas; from what we've seen of Star Trek Into Darkness, Cumberbatch's Harrison is an unfamiliar character whose true nature has yet to be revealed.

What do YOU think, my Trekkies? Lay all your theories down in the comments below.


'Star Trek Into Darkness' Nine-Minute IMAX Prologue: Doom, Gloom, and Benedict Cumberbatch

'Star Trek Into Darkness' Should Be The Re-Hash Of Khan

Follow Jen Yamato on Twitter.
Follow Movieline on Twitter.

Pages: 1 2


  • Zach Amellio says:

    For the last two years I have got my daughters costume from The Children's Place. They are always a really good price that are very warm and cute. They also usually have a lot of accessories to go with the costume. Old Navy usually has cute one's too I just find that The Children's Place has better quality and warmer costumes.

  • My brother recommended I might like this blog. He used to be entirely right.
    This publish truly made my day. You can not consider just how a lot time
    I had spent for this information! Thank you!

  • Hi my family member! I want to say that this post is amazing, great written and include
    almost all significant infos. I'd like to see extra posts like this .

  • Great goods from you, man. I have take into account your stuff prior to and
    you are simply extremely great. I really like what you have bought here, certainly like what you
    are saying and the way through which you assert it. You're making it entertaining and you still care for to keep it sensible. I can't wait to read far more from you.
    That is really a great website.

  • Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts and I
    am waiting for your further post thank you once again.

  • of course like your web-site however you need to take a look at the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very bothersome to inform the truth on the other hand I'll definitely come again again.

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s