Who's Stoked For Dracula and Van Helsing?
Or Van Helsing and Dracula, or whatever Sony's apparently calling it? Don't everyone speak up at once. [Fusible]
Subscribe to the new Movieline on YouTube
- Gun-owner Chipper Jones against civilians having assault weapons
- Parents arrested for binding daughter with duct tape
- Rome gets rare snowfall, and it's an ancient winter wonderland
- Gap's new ad 'normalizing' breastfeeding is making people really, really happy
- 5 secret shopping perks only Costco members know about
Comments
Please tell me it's a "reboot" about their days as wacky mismatched post-collegiate roommates.
I'd buy that for a dollar! In pennies. If only to destroy it.
And have James Franco & Seth Rogen play the title characters. Call it "High Stakes".
James Franco is not a pothead. He's just really, really relaxed.
When listing the worst films I've ever seen, Van Helsing is always at the top of the list. Can't wait to see how the sequel will rank! An even BIGGER loud, flashy, confusing mess! Genius!
I'm soooo confused. Van Helsing was a Universal film, which I always remember because Universal's been dying to relaunch the "Universal Monsters". Which is why we got The Wolf Man a couple years back, why we're getting The Creature of the Black Lagoon again, why they're planning on redoing The Bride of Frankenstein and apparently "rebooting" Dracula. Obviously Dracula is public domain, but why would Sony want to get involved in this mess? Unless Dracula and Van Helsing fall in love and they have to fight werewolves for each other???
Obviously Dracula is public domain, but why would Sony want to get involved in this mess?
1. Because it is public domain.
2. Because the Hugh Jackman one made $300m worldwide for Universal, which way overspent on it. Sony probably believes -- accurately, I think -- that they can spend less to make more.
I want Vanhelzing and Dracula in the next movie and a lot of different monsters.