REVIEW: Sofia Coppola Brings a Delicate Touch, and Sure-Handed Precision, to Somewhere

Movieline Score: 10

somewhere_rev_2.jpg

That's the beginning of a father-daughter adventure that brings Cleo and Johnny first to a local ice-skating rink (where Cleo attends her regular lesson), and later, circuitously, to Milan, where Johnny has been scheduled to receive an award. Johnny's ex has declared a indeterminate "time out" on motherhood, and entrusted Cleo's care to Johnny. Cleo tags along with her fawned-over movie-star dad, reveling in their luxurious Italian digs like an overnight principessa. Their last stop is summer camp: Cleo's mom has given Johnny firm instructions -- he obviously needs them -- to drop her off there by a certain date. He makes the deadline, even though he has to hire a helicopter to do it.

Somewhere moves forward not in strict linear terms, but in gently lapping waves. Coppola, working with genius editor Sarah Flack (who also cut Lost in Translation and Marie Antoinette, as well as Steven Soderbergh's masterwork, The Limey), ends every sequence in precisely the right place, which isn't always the place you expect. Here and there she'll add or subtract a few extra beats, and the effect is momentarily disorienting before settling into perfection.

In one scene, Johnny's plunked into a chair so a few special-effects makeup guys can take a mold of his face, a prelude to creating the age makeup he'll need, apparently, for an upcoming role. They tell him to keep his eyes and mouth closed (adding, with a twist of Coppola's trademark dry wit, that the whole process "shouldn't take more than 40 minutes") and proceed to cover his head and face with a gooey white substance. Then as he waits -- and waits -- Coppola and her DP, Harris Savides, train the camera on him, moving in slowly on this heavy-breathing mashed-potato monster. This unnaturally elongated moment is funny and strange and poignant all at once, for the way Johnny's droopy white mask suggests the saggy skin of an old man, a goofy-sorrowful image that's far more affecting than the makeup guys' finished work, which is merely a Hollywoodized premonition of what Johnny might look like as a wrinkled senior citizen.

I suspect Coppola has definite ideas about how the characters she writes ought to be played. But the performances she draws out of her actors never feel constrained or overworked; they always breathe. Dorff is superb here as a guy who's only just realizing that it's not enough to merely love his daughter; he has to really see her, too. Dorff has enough swagger to play a scruffy action star -- he channels some of the loose, leathery coolness (and even a bit of the shyness) he brought to his role as Stuart Sutcliffe in Iain Softley's marvelous Backbeat, about the early days of the Beatles. Dorff is remarkable here not because he advertises how Johnny is changed by this small interlude of time with his daughter, but because he shows virtually nothing -- his face betrays glimmers of anguish and joy, as if Johnny is rediscovering the pleasure and heartache of being a real person, as opposed to just playing one.

In one lovely, austere sequence (it's set to the Strokes' "I'll Try Anything Once"), Johnny and Cleo enjoy an afternoon on the grounds of the Chateau Marmont, first playing ping-pong, later lounging side-by-side, like pale California vampires, in the egg-frying sun. They jump into the pool and let themselves sink to the very bottom, where they stage an impromptu make-believe tea party, raising delicate pretend china cups to their lips. But it's Johnny who instigates the game, not Cleo. The moment suggests that Johnny, the absentee dad, will always cling to some remnants of Cleo's little-girl self -- that's his prerogative as a father -- even though she herself will soon have to fold them up and leave them behind.

Fanning is superb as Johnny's partner in crime; she's a preternaturally self-possessed elf. Cleo adores her father, to the point that she's probably forgiven too many of his foibles and absences. But she doesn't let him off the hook completely: She's exasperated and embarrassed by his sexual exploits (he's a babe magnet, and he doesn't turn off the charm even when his daughter's around) -- she glowers at him with the barely contained hostility of a grade-school Gorgon. But she also laughs when he kicks her ass at Guitar Hero, and she enjoys plenty of yuks with her father's closest friend (and something of a benign hanger-on), Sammy (Chris Pontius, in a silly-wonderful little performance). A natural-born caretaker, she matter-of-factly orders up milk, cheese and a cheese grater from room service. so she can make macaroni and cheese in the suite's kitchenette. Fanning, like Dorff, underplays everything here -- she never allows herself to be the adorable child -- and her restraint is the thing that makes her only moment of true, childlike helplessness so deeply affecting.

Coppola is a filmmaker who fills up a big canvas with small moments: That's the opposite of working in miniature, even though she's attuned to the tiniest details. The most extraordinary scene in Somewhere takes place at that ice rink, as Cleo executes the routine she's probably been rehearsing for months. It's an ice dance choreographed to Gwen Stefani's "Cool" -- a song about reconciliation with a loved one, but only after crossing a mighty river of pain -- and Cleo runs through the moves in a way that's alternately rehearsed and unstudied.

Johnny sits in the stands, his eyes at first focused on his PDA. He glances up now and then, wearing a look of practiced boredom, to catch a little of Cleo's routine. And then he's stopped cold by the evanescence of the moment -- by the evanescence of Cleo, whose legs haven't yet decided where to begin and where to end; her arms are half-willowy, half-gangly. She's in that in-between season, a silverleaf moment that will be over in a flash. If Johnny blinks, he'll miss it. Something in him shakes loose.

The whole of Somewhere is about that something shaking loose. How can that even be a subject for a movie? Is there really enough there to fill a short, let alone a feature? But that's Coppola's gift, the ability to build a movie around nothing more than a whisper (even, in the case of Lost in Translation, a literal whisper). Somewhere is a movie with a resolute sense of time and place -- Savides' cinematography captures both the toaster-oven light and the grayish-blue evening magic of Los Angeles. Through his lens, and through Coppola's eyes, it's less a city than a country unto itself out in the middle of nowhere. Coppola puts an X on the spot, and what she finds there is gold.

Pages: 1 2



Comments

  • Richard Crawford says:

    It's cheering that the best movie critic writing today completely gets the best movie of the year, "Somewhere".
    Thank you, Stephanie.
    Richard Crawford.

  • metroville says:

    As exhibited by The Virgin Suicides, Coppola is a filmmaker capable of expressing elegiac snapshots of relatable humanity.
    As exhibited by Lost In Translation, she's the privileged offspring of a talented filmmaker who mistakenly believes that the average person cares about the time Spike Jonze didn't pay her an acceptable amount of attention on an all-expenses-paid trip to Japan, leaving her only with bottles of Dom Pérignon and the inadvertent opportunity to hang with Harrison Ford for a while. (And mostly because Bill Murray happened to kick ass in the Harrison Ford role, her narrow-minded view was validated.)
    A '10' for this one, Stephanie? A '9.5' and I wouldn't even have bothered to comment (especially considering that I was on your side while the crazy people attacked you for your unfavorable review of Inception--despite the fact that I happen to like that movie)... But if Somewhere truly is a perfect film in every way (including accessibility to the audience), I quit--and I will live out my days watching my DVD of Judgment Night on a continuous loop. (That's a Stephen Dorff movie that speaks to me.)

  • Phil Edwards says:

    Metroville, that seems off point. It might be fair to say that Coppola gets to make unique movies like these because of her rarified status, but her ability to make them is entirely earned and entirely her own. Nepotism alone can't make someone see the world as beautifully and truthfully as she does.

  • TimeLagged says:

    Okay with this review Stephanie is now forgiven for the glowing review of that hideous drek "The Tourist", which I'll just chalk up to our usual reader-reviewer mind meld going on vacation. To Europe. To make movies about other movies, throwing every overripe cliche from other movies into a pot and stirring, then serving up a horrible and tasteless stew made out of the worst parts of other spy movies, and not even the good parts. And getting a really bad haircut while there.
    But I digress.
    The idea of a Western hadn't even occurred to me when watching this wonderful movie, but as usual Stephanie has teased out something that was sort of there and just hadn't become conscious. It had me at the first scene, and the desolate, bright, disturbingly over-pleasant and empty landscape is very much a part of why. It's a landscape I know. That's why perhaps the idea of a Western wouldn't occur to me: growing up there, the entire world was a Western, at least in the sense that this review is using that word. It would be years before I discovered that there were places that weren't.
    Absolutely brilliant. Movie and review.

  • scout661 says:

    Such a great film. I had to see it twice :). I would give it a 200. By the way, what do you think happened in the ending. why did he leave his keys in the car? why did he leave his car? all these great questions 🙂

  • Sco says:

    "(Johnny has been injured doing a stunt — “I do all my own stuntwork,” he announces proudly at one point, as if anyone around him really cared.)"
    Um, I'm pretty sure that drunken fall down the stairs at a party at the beginning of the movie is how he broke his arm...not doing a stunt, though I do not doubt that Johnny is the kind of person who would boast about stuntwork.

  • munzz says:

    he didnt' injure himself doing a stunt. he fell off the stairs at a party.
    The fact that he said that instead to his wife and daughter is so telling about what kind of character he is and what he is going through..
    I'm quite surprised someone who is getting paid to professionally review a film can miss something like this.

  • KJames says:

    @Munzz. Seriously, you're surprised that Ms. Zacharek missed a short scene implying Marco's fall and broken arm . . . and instead went with Marco's explanation instead? Does it matter? No.