'You Sent a Message All Right -- That You're Idiots': Boardwalk Empire Recapped

Attention 14-year-old boys of all ages: Paz de la Huerta returned to Boardwalk Empire last night after a brief absence, and if you were hoping that she'd end up naked and riding Michael Shannon's Nelson Van Alden (while calling him "daddy"), you're in luck! Because that happened. Let's skip down the yellow brick road and assess the damage from "The Emerald City."

So, yes: Nelson got his freak on with Lucy -- too bad Shannon didn't talk about filming that scene -- but only after striking out with Margaret by telling her that he wanted to save her from burning in hell. (Nothing says "love" like talk of hellfire and damnation.) But while Nelson's rushed arc throughout "The Emerald City" -- which member of Dorothy's entourage does he represent? The Cowardly Lion? -- was a very nice contrast with the relationship between Nucky and Margaret, the crux of the episode dealt with the increasingly violent Jimmy.

Back in Atlantic City and free from the murder charges that dogged him last week -- ah, crooked cops -- Jimmy was free to be Jimmy. That meant having sex with Angela (but not in a rape-y way), playing with his son, and beating who he thought was Angela's lover to a pulp. Poor, smug photographer jerk! That's what you get for shunning Angela last week. Never mind that it was your wife who was Angela's "kissing friend." Also: Jimmy still doesn't know Angela is a lesbian. Alas, maybe next week.

Jimmy also did a bit of murdering, killing the first of the Stupid D'Alessio brothers with a shot to the head (CGI blood splatter isn't just for The Walking Dead). That moment, with Nucky on hand to confront his failed assassins, was one of the most matter-of-fact and chilling on Boardwalk Empire to date. Jimmy shot Mouthy D'Alessio without a second thought, and Nucky just stood and watched, unmoved. He isn't half-a-gangster anymore.

Which brings us to Margaret, who was busy going down her own rabbit hole of iniquity. Spurred on by Nucky, she not only imbibed a bit of champagne to celebrate the passing of women's suffrage, but Margaret also became part of the political machine by pushing Nucky's patsy mayoral candidate on the women of Atlantic City. Margaret has learned a valuable lesson through the first season of Boardwalk Empire: Give the people what they want. Exactly what she wants remains to be seen, but perhaps some slightly better writing and a bit more development will help her in season two. Besides, Boardwalk Empire needs to keep the one female character that isn't just there to take her clothes off continually layered.

Of course, there were other machinations and advances during "The Emerald City" -- Chalky came back and got vengeance for his lynched driver; Nucky made his plans known indirectly to Arnold Rothstein -- but basically it just set the pieces into place for what should be a bang-up final two episodes. Yes, history is an enemy here -- we know that Rothstein doesn't die until 1928, so anything that Atlantic City's great and powerful wizard wants to set in motion against him won't succeed -- but that doesn't mean it won't be fun watching them fail.

More important though, Boardwalk Empire has finally revealed itself for what it is: An overstuffed with riches polemic on political power, and the lengths to which men will go to keep it. That's great -- this isn't The Sopranos and doesn't want to be -- but if it had better writing, it would be even greater. You'll notice I didn't waste a sentence discussing Al Capone learning to become a man from a Bar Mitzvah, or Richard Harrow joking about being the Tin Man. Apologies to both Stephen Graham and Jack Huston -- especially Huston, who is simply wonderful -- but those scenes were better suited for Screenwriting 101 than an acclaimed HBO drama. Boardwalk Empire has the tools to do whatever it wants as a series; let's hope the final episodes in season one amount to more than just a really sharp looking bookcase.



Comments

  • casting couch says:

    I think the writing is great on this show, and I don't agree with the dismissal of Capone's and Harrow's scenes -- those were nice moments of character development. The highlight, as you rightly pointed out though, was of course Van Alden's evening of whisky and cooz.

  • Lamont says:

    I love that show. HBO has did it again lets just hope they don't cancel it like some of there other better programs.

  • LucysBigBush says:

    I can sort of see why Chris would dismiss the Capone scenes, but Harrow's definitely needed some acknowledgement and analyzation. Im not sure if he chose to skip those parts of the episode out of laziness or just a lack of ability to adequately interpret what he saw on the screen. Judging by the rest of the 'recap' I am leaning towards the latter. Chris tends to focus on the most superficial and unnecessary events in each episode. The absence of any real insight is too bad because he is a talented writer.
    Does anyone out there know of any other sites that recap this show? I would be grateful for a link. I just cant stand reading Mr. Rosen's bullshit 'recaps' anymore.

  • There is a lot to unpack here -- not the least of which is your trollish attitude and mother's basement-like personality -- but putting those social defects aside for now, let's talk Boardwalk.
    What would you like analyzed about the Harrow scenes exactly? Seemed like it was pretty straight forward to my pea brain: The children were scared of him, then they weren't after he said he was the Tin Man. If you're looking for some deeper meaning and subtext there, good luck. If anything it shows that Margaret is losing herself to the world of privileged, as she skeeved Richard in the beginning of the episode (the lack of face will do that), but then slowly remembered that he was a human being like everyone else by the end. I don't think Harrow has anything to do on the show -- but since Huston is brilliant and he's always interesting to watch, it's fun to have him grace-noting scenes. He's one of Boardwalk Empire's most superfluously important creations.

  • SaltySue says:

    LucysBigBush- Salon, Hollywood.com, WSJ.com all have good episode recaps/reviews, NY Mag, Vanity Fair, and Esquire do an okay job as well.
    I had to stop commenting on Chris's reviews because I couldn't stand his non-stop complaining and short-changing of this show. I'm just glad he's finally realized Boardwalk Empire is not trying to be The Sopranos or Mad Men. I think his interview with Michael Shannon last week helped him realize how small minded he was being.

  • Yes, because having issues with a show that isn't all that wonderful sometimes means that I'm small minded. Fabulous observation.

  • stwsr says:

    The show is ok, and certainly not as fantastic as all of you are clamoring about.
    "Dexter" is far more entertaining and there are loads of stuff for those who want to psychoanalyze every-little-thing. I guess it makes them feel smart.

  • Yobee says:

    I'm late to this party, but I agree with the comments asserting that Rosen's remarks on the quality of the writing and story development are off-base.
    This is the best drama to hit cable since Dead like Me and Deadwood were prematurely consigned to the scrapheap.
    The writing is superb, the acting flawless and the integration of fictional characters with the facts of history is fascinating and extremely well done.
    I look forward to season two, followed by many more with this terrific ensemble of writers, producers, directors and actors.