Jennifer Aniston To Show Boobs To Regain Crown As America's Sweetheart
Pop quiz, Jennifer Aniston: You just headlined a sperm-based comedy that opened in MacGruberian eighth place; your two movies previous were a disappointment and a bomb, respectively -- what do you do? The answer is, you take off your top and kiss another woman.
Aniston will be starring in Judd Apatow's Wanderlust, where she and Paul Rudd will play a married couple that tires of the rat race and decides to turn on, tune in, and drop out by joining a hippie commune.
Because this is an Apatow flick (in a hippie commune, no less!), there will of course be copious amounts of weed. But in addition to all that ganja, Jen will also be taking off her clothes, indulging in a few threesomes and even get all sexy-sexy with another lady. Which, of course, Aniston is no stranger to.
In completely unrelated news, Salt has grossed over $110 million domestically this summer, making it the seventh $100 million-plus film for Academy Award-winner Angelina Jolie.
· Jennifer Aniston to Strip Naked in Her Next Movie [/Film]
Subscribe to the new Movieline on YouTube
Comments
If Aniston expects showing her tittehs will work wonders with her career she's mistaken. Two little, too late.
"Two little"? They're raindrop-shaped and they're (presumably) awesome and you go ahead and shut your damn mouth.
(This comment has been made on behalf of every straight man/gay woman who has taste in entertainment yet has been inexplicably rooting for Aniston despite her many very bad movies to date.)
Love Happens was an actual movie? I thought that was more Funny People viral marketing nonsense.
Aniston has had 4 $100M+ in her 20 movie career - and that's on top of having a 10 yr mega-sitcomeunder her belt, AND doesn't include disney animation pix, OR action franchises... So I guess gratuitous violence vs nudity/romantic comedies is fairly even here in success. Personally, don't see the difference - violence and nudity/sex are two sides of the same coin. There's really no difference in having a woman with a gun in her hand vs doing nude scenes - both are designed to bring in male audiences....
It's funny how much press she gets whereas Barrymore, Bullock etc get nothing - no dedicated blog posts all around the interest from CNN to LA times to movieline about Aniston's state of career etc. Do you feel dirty deriding her for her career choices ad nauseum while knowing the reason you are posting is you needing her to get hits on your website .
I guess you're lucky no one does a commentaries ad nauseum on 'hypocritical blogs and articles' - blogs that create posts and articles saying Aniston's career is thanks to the triangle and she keeps the 'triangle alive' regardless of how empty the articles are or how they exploit that very same triangle for the sake of just generating hits that Aniston's name so easily provides. Yes - the triangle was fortunate for a lot of groups - biggest beneficiary i think would be the entertainment media....
Dude, let's be real; you totally found this article from googling "Jennifer Aniston Boobs," right?
Isn't this the second round of 'please go see nude Aniston,' in her next movie that is yet to be funded or filmed, in as many months? All it is, is press that's been planted by her PR agent. A month or so ago, we got all these blurbs about her 45 yr old breasteses appearing in Horrible Bosses -- items that had her agent playing coy with the press (simultaneously leaking the item, then issuing a comment - PR 101). Aniston is nude more than Jenna Jamieson these days -- none of this is new or novel. She stripped for that Owen Wilson/ X-mas Dog movie. She then backed that up by being in just a tie on a magazine as well...and posing all cougar like with chippendale dancers who were young enough to be her sons. LOL That's all well and good, but to keep issuing a press release on her nips when you can see them daily and twice on Sunday in syndication - is pretty f*ckin' hilarious. It just demonstrates a level of sad desperation that is both funny, and pathetic. Aniston should take a break, try and get a life, and at least try and fool people into thinking there's something she cares about more than being a poor man's Sandra Bullock. Then maybe we might want to revisit her in 5 years.....on TV...w/ an ensemble cast...that is much more talented than she....so we'll be sure and tune in.
all that glitters isnt really gold sometimes its fools gold
JENIFER ANISTON GET 4 TIMES MAKING 110MILLIONS BECAUSE THE SUCCESED OF HER FAMOUS CO-STARS. NOT HERSLF.JEN IS NO TALENT.
Do dig, ML and recap the Debby Reynolds/Elizabeth Taylor saga. It might help Anniston keep her shirt on and give your readers the inside tip on picking a battle of the boobs winner.
Yeh, I know I'm here late but the topic remains hot so we're all being served and that's the point, eh?
I actually like Jen but this just smacks of desperation I mean who is she Kim Catrall?! Unless she wants a new 'image' as the go-to cougar roles she needs to find a new and funny outlet fast. Maybe something like 'Good Girl' or more indie stuff.
I really sick of hearing about her. Who cares?
She was gorgeous back in the day, but then she went on a starvation diet, mutilated herself with plastic surgery and started herself firmly on the Joan Rivers route.
This will go down in movie history with Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places and Halle Berry in Swordfish.