Emmy Spotlight: Is Bryan Cranston Set for a Threepeat?
In today's edition of Emmy Spotlight, Movieline takes on the Best Actor in a Drama category. Could Friday Night Lights's Kyle Chandler steal a win away from heavy hitters Bryan Cranston and Michael C. Hall, or will the Lost finale earn Matthew Fox his first win off of his first nomination? Join us for a rundown of the odds.
Notable snubs: Simon Baker, The Mentalist, Timothy Olyphant, Justified, Clarke Peters, Treme, Kiefer Sutherland, 24,
Bryan Cranston, Breaking Bad
For Him: The world knows that Breaking Bad's third season was its best, with one of the most harrowing, brain-splitting finales of the past decade. In a TV landscape awash with antiheroes, the character of Walter White is unquestionably the most chilling. Cranston deserves this one even more than his previous two now that Walter's already-monstrous instincts have turned murderous.
Against Him: Choosing Cranston for the win would be an act of defiance for the Emmys, who'd be voting against the gaining speed of the under-rewarded Michael C. Hall.
Odds: 2:1
Michael C. Hall, Dexter
For Him: With a Golden Globe under his belt, Hall is completely formidable for the win. Dexter has the strange ability to get more addictive the longer its on, so the narrative momentum works in his favor too. Hall's submitted episode, where he tracks down and kills Trinity, is one of his best displays of screen command.
Against Him: Cranston! It's difficult not to draw up a Venn Diagram and match Walter's unhinged quirks with Dexter's, but I think you'd come to only one conclusion: Walter is more unnervingly (and impressively) twisted.
Odds: 4:1
Hugh Laurie, House
For Him: Like clockwork, Laurie's new nomination is no surprise. He has yet to win the award after four other nominations, but his submission episode is the surreal season opener where he's just about the only actor we see in a two-hour mental ward trip. If this stark character examination won't win him the Emmy, nothing will.
Against Him: It's pretty difficult to win an overdue Emmy when your series has famously seen better days.
Odds: 7:1
Matthew Fox, Lost
For Him: The Lost finale was Fox's best ever performance, and his first nomination is long overdue. If you were along for the ride of Lost, Fox's work on the finale was perhaps more satisfying than the limbo metaphor that tied up the series for good.
Against Him: But again, it's his first nomination. Of all the ways to honor Lost as it exits our living room portals, a lead acting win may be a longshot. Fox will have to channel the power of Andre Braugher to make it work.
Odds: 10:1
Jon Hamm, Mad Men
For Him: Mad Men is hip to love and hipper to nominate. Matthew Weiner's characters are engrossingly dark portraits preserved in cellophane, and Jon Hamm's Don Draper is the hardest candy of the bunch. In Hamm's nominated episode, Don admits to Betty that he's not Don Draper at all, which resulted in a storm of tears unseen since one of Sally's outbursts on behalf of Uncle Gene. It was Hamm's most vulnerable moment yet.
Against Him: There's something about that well-varnished exterior that sometimes makes Don Draper seem more like a shell of a great character than a fully realized being.
Odds: 15:1
Kyle Chandler, Friday Night Lights
For Him: Someone woke up at the Emmy factory and decided Friday Night Lights was invited, and now we can expect a flood of appreciation to head its way. Emmy night could be the beginning of the show's recrowning as the best drama on TV.
Against Him: With all these finale performances and freakish protagonists clogging the running, Chandler needs to amp up his following and wait another year to win.
Odds: 15:1


Comments
It's Monk all over again!
Please please let it be Matthew Fox. He was sooooo good in that finale and it's his last shot....
i am so rooting against Fox. Cranston, Hall and Laurie are far far better than him. i do not miss those jears.
Viva la jears!
Grandpa Gene, please.
Kyle Chandler, all the way!
I am so disappointed that Simon Baker didn't get a nod.
whats all the fuss about , these God like figures getting awards for their little acting abilities, the sick truth about the over paid snobs and proud necked bunch that a desent days work would mostly likely take them out,
their proud looks and all the money that comes their way is just how sick the general public is concerning movies , all movies are is a bunch of made up lies, that they public love to embrace' the movie stars all God like figures to the public , people worship them and they are like idols , but really its all a joke on the general movie watcher , you get the movie and they get rich , and neither of the big time actors would not give a dime to you if you was starving to death' i see them as they are over paid snobs who isn;t no better than anyone else that resides on this earth, the little awards they get will grumble and be forgotten in the coming future and be just as worthless as a grain of sand.. yes they have the public eating out of their hands, money like a swollen river flows into their pround pockets
well said homer, when are the people of this world going to wake the heck up? they walk around like zombies waiting for their next order from the media to follow. there is no doubt that most actors would be part of the welfare system if this sector of the entertainment industry died!! (actually many probably do receive unemployment while in between gigs!)