What Leonard Nimoy's Retirement Means to Fringe
Unless you're a giant nerd, you might not have noticed that Leonard Nimoy announced that he's retiring from acting: "I've been doing this professionally for 60 years. I love the idea of going out on a positive note." The positive note he refers to is J.J. Abrams's Star Trek, a film series that he'll have no problem detaching from -- after all, one Spock is really enough. But what of Nimoy's other Abrams enterprise, Fringe? That's where things get more complicated.
Nimoy was famously cast last season as William Bell, the Wizard behind most of the crazy science and weekly madness on Fringe. Clearly it was a role that the producers envisioned being around for the long haul -- an older adversary/misunderstood partner for John Noble's Walter Bishop to tangle with -- and one central to the very core of the series. To wit: He first season ended with a visit to William Bell's alternate reality office inside a still standing World Trade Center.
Granted, it's likely that Abrams and his fellow Fringe producers expected to be without Nimoy going forward -- news of his "retirement" has been circulating since last fall -- but that doesn't make it any less damaging to their narrative. Even though William Bell hasn't appeared on the show since December, he's still mentioned on a weekly basis with the hush tones and worried glaces that Lost characters used for Jacob in the early going.
So what will Fringe decide to do? Nimoy will supposedly make one final appearance in the season finale, leaving the series with two options: Kill him off or recast the role with another geek icon. Here's guessing Patrick Stewart should expect a phone call.
· Leonard Nimoy set to retire [Toronto Sun]
Comments
Yes, yes. Patrick Stewart'll work. Or Ian McKellen. Oh yeah! Magneto and Professor X FTW!
Watching Leonard Nimoy's teeth when he talked on the show was like watching the next wind-up killing machine from Saw.
I would love to see Joh Malkovich or Dennis Franz recast as William Bell!
Since LOST likes to use iconic characters from other sucessful shows as guest casualties...I mean "characters", why not use Michael Emerson?
Naw, him and Quinn already have a gig they're pitching.I guess you could throw in a "sideways-reality" and use the entire cast from LOST.
When William Bell was mentioned in the pilot I always expected Terry O'Quinn. Personally I think its selfish of Nimoy to shut them out. he was basically retired anyway. he hadn't acted for 8 years before Star Trek (and even that was just an animated film and a Becker episode). So whats the big deal with doing one or two 'Fringe' episodes a season if they ask him too? Its maybe a week or two out of his life.
When William Bell was mentioned in the pilot I always expected Terry O'Quinn. Personally I think its selfish of Nimoy to shut them out. he was basically retired anyway. he hadn't acted for 8 years before Star Trek (and even that was just an animated film and a Becker episode). So whats the big deal with doing one or two 'Fringe' episodes a season if they ask him too? Its maybe a week or two out of his life.
Frankly, I'd like to see Peter Weller's character from the White Tulip episode (somehow) reprise his role someday. Hey, with time travel you can do anything, even prevent car crashes!
Get over Bell. Fringe doesn't have to have Nimoy to do just fine. It did without Nimoy until he finally showed. It's not like his acting has been what his character has been about; it's the role within the mythology. The writers and producers, and for the love of bob, the stars, will carry on as usual making a brilliant show. Noble, Jackson & Torv are strong enough to carry the show without Bell. In some ways, the story can't move forward WITH him.
he seemed pretty dead, don't you think?
Spare me. Bell's not necessary and is easily replaced - most likely by Walternate. The only Bell has done in his grand total of 10 screen minutes is exposition. I like Nimoy, but you overhyping his character's importance is the quickest way to tune me out of your column.
I come from the future. Nimoy ended up reprising his role later in the series after all.
[…] alt="Once upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] on a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ […]
[…] upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] 2013, “I never slow down because I love to work.” Once upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] 2013, “I never slow down because I love to work.” Once upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] on a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ […]
[…] on a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ […]
[…] on a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of a acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] 2013, “I never slow down because I love to work.” Once upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] on a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of a acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]
[…] upon a time, Leonard Nimoy planned to get out of the acting business for good with J.J. Abrams’ 2009 movie, “Star Trek.” And then, a few […]