Riots, Records Collide as Bollywood Epic Becomes First Big Sleeper of 2010

shahrukh_khan_still_top.jpg

Fox Searchlight had what could most charitably called a schizophrenic 2009, following its long-coveted Best Picture Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire with a succession of underwhelming or just flat-out terrible late-year releases like Gentleman Broncs and Amelia. And then came the rebound: Crazy Heart, which the mini-major expertly dropped into this year's Oscar race; and much more surprisingly, My Name is Khan, a nearly three-hour romance/road movie featuring Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan as an Asperger's-afflicted immigrant attempting to win his true love's heart while mounting an Islam-awareness campaign all the way to Washington, D.C. Or something. I think. Like almost every other critic in America, I haven't seen it. But hundreds of thousands of ticketbuyers have, making Khan the first sleeper hit of the young year -- and not just a little bit controversial either.

Khan earned a total of $2.275 million in its first four days on 120 screens, drawing a per-theater average of nearly $19,000. That outperformed the more obvious holiday blockbuster Valentine's Day by about $750 per screen, doing so on a record-breaking President's Day weekend with virtually no conventional advertising, exactly one positive review and no word-of-mouth outside the Indian community. A Movieline tipster who attended a screening Friday night wrote that even a representative from Fox "looked very confused and confessed she had not seen a single ad for it. I hadn't either, leading me to wonder how the hell all the Indians heard about it. Did Fox post exclusively ads in Hindu temples?"

Yes and no. Word-of-mouth was likely a bigger factor, particularly conservative Hindus' reactions to Khan's compassionate stance toward Muslims. (Khan himself was detained last year at Newark International Airport, causing a minor international incident.) That relationship played into the cross-cultural success of Slumdog, and this time around, Fox's day-and-date release strategy meant that anti-Khan riots in Mumbai on Friday got back to the United States in the early morning hours before the superstar's film opened here. With or without the ads, demand was primed.

But did Khan deliver? Our tipster says yes! Well, kind of:

Like most Bollywood movies, the humor was simple enough to be understood by people who speak English as a second language. Unlike most Bollywood movies, there were NO big dance numbers. No-one's going to win any awards for this except maybe the cinematographer (some of the shots were quite beautiful). Shah Rukh Khan goes full retard for his role as Khan. I'm confident the entire audience understood how ridiculous the movie was as they were laughing at all of the wrong moments. I have no idea how it'll play outside of Indian audiences but I think it has the potential to go viral, or at least get angry press releases from the NAACP, autism activists, and Republicans.

Now that's when you know you're on to something. Welcome back, Searchlight!

· My Name is Khan [Box Office Mojo]



Comments

  • radiant says:

    you are the most racist reviewer. it was a wonderful movie, khan was excellent as an person suffering from aspergers. kajol was excellent as the mother who lost her son to a race attack. and it was a lovely story. many americans and nonindians do need a movie like this to learn about other cultures. the 1st half is a true story. and it doesnt have to win awards in america to be a great movie. it will sweep the national awards in india. the audience wasnt laughing ridiculous moments. the indians understand all the cultural references in the movie and are laughing with full comprehension. many of the moments are real. and the song we shall overcome is a song that was translate into hindi during indian independence. it wasnt meant to ridicule blacks. it is showing the similarity of the same tune song when all hope is lost. wake up to the other side of the world. just because the ocean divides america from the most of the world doesnt mean you have to be ignorant and prejudice againt "bollywood " movies. maybe become more broad minded.

  • radiant says:

    would rather not have you review the movie. there are more valid reviews about it be people who have some knowledge about it atleast. you're wasting your time. ppl will still see it even if you deny its a great film. have a nice day!

  • Old No.7 says:

    No wonder it took 3 hours to talk to tech support about my computer warranty this weekend.

  • Ramesh Bala says:

    This is how Indian origin people in the US come to know about MNIK: In US, we have south asian TV channels which carries the movie's songs, release date etc., Also local indian newspapers and websites about movies and news. There are lot of cinemas which show Indian movies. So we go their website for show timings.

  • One of the ways Americans (Indians and non-Indians alike) heard about this film was from The Bollywood Ticket: The American guide to Indian movies at http://www.thebollywoodticket.com.

  • Amrita says:

    The reason why it did well was because it's a SRK movie and if you think Viggomaniacs are scary (I do!) then you should be hiding under the bed from the wrath of Khanians. They'll get their SRK fix even when their lives are threatened as Mumbai found out on opening weekend. I'm surprised you haven't been comment-bombed.

  • rani says:

    fans of indian cinema will find out about what movie is playing no matter where they are in the world...its catchy entertainment and thats how it is.