Can Anyone Afford an Anchorman Sequel?

anchorman_small.jpg

America may be drowning in a tidal surge of sequels, threequels, prequels, reboots and remakes, but it doesn't have to be. Or at least it doesn't have to feel that way -- not if studios would just select its franchises with a little less cynicism and a little more taste. Like Anchorman, for example: An $85 million hit five years ago, a cult classic on DVD, received decent reviews, and featuring a generally beloved cast. Yet while Lionsgate has managed to make five Saw films in the interim, we're still waiting for DreamWorks to close a deal to bring back Will Ferrell, Steve Carell, Paul Rudd and writer-director Adam McKay. And apparently Ferrell might be waiting for the same thing -- for a long time.

Ferrell went on the air in Australia recently to promote Land of the Lost, telling his hosts that Anchorman's four principals would meet next week to discuss a sequel. Despite joking that Carell and Rudd would have to take pay cuts because he definitely wouldn't, the potential budget isn't really very funny to DreamWorks, which only recently managed to hammer out a financing and distribution arrangement with Disney and its equity backers in India.

After all, in the half-decade since the $24 million original, Ferrell and Carell have blossomed into precious (if slightly inconsistent) commodities; Rudd's closing in after I Love You, Man and Role Models combined for $140 million domestically less than six months apart. Factor in McKay and Judd Apatow, for whom Anchorman represented his own big-screen producing breakthrough, and you've got kind of a perfect storm that hints why this group's films are so rarely franchised out: Who can afford them? Despite all of Ferrell's signature cash cows -- Ron Burgundy, Ricky Bobby, Chazz Michael Michaels (never mind Jackie Moon) -- he has never starred in a sequel. Carell, meanwhile, was a low-budget Jim Carrey alternative in Evan Almighty, and we all know how that turned out.

So even if there's a script, and everyone is coming back (except Christina Applegate, who is expendable no matter how much you want to see her return), what kind of insane first-dollar deals will be required to finance this in 2009? Is Ferrell franchisable in the first place? Is it even worth the hassle for Carell, who already has The Office and the inevitable Get Smart 2 on his plate for the next 12 months? And does Rudd really want to share another poster with these guys when he can write (not to mention develop) his own ticket? Sincerest best wishes for that meeting, everyone -- that's quite an agenda for one day.

· Anchorman 2 Fastly Approaching? [Moviehole via /film]



Comments

  • JudgeFudge says:

    Even if the math works out to get everyone back, I still don't know if people would really see an Anchorman 2. Despite the good will that the first film garnered, its a pretty shotty film, even by Will Farrell comedy standards. I think that the moviegoing audience's pallet might have refined consideribly in the interim, what with the "Golden Age of Apatow" and the two great Paul Rudd movies that have been released since.
    If you can get David Wain and Elizabeth Banks on board, and keep the production budget in the 50's, then, maybe...

  • Juancho says:

    Well, Samantha Who? just got canned, so Applegate is looking for work.

  • Between this and news of a movie based on the "Battleship" board game, it's pretty clear Hollywood has no clue where to find an original idea.
    Why don't big stars lower their prices once in a while if they really love a project? Why does an "Anchorman" sequel have to cost so much? Does anyone really want a sequel to a fun, amusing comedy that wore out its biggest joke halfway through its running time?

  • We've already started writing this in hopes that the stars will align and all those wonderful people who are in every single solitary comedy made in the last four years will take part in it.
    We guarantee that it will be funny as hell (despite audience apathy for Seth Rogen).
    And that no one connected to the actual project will ever read it.
    Except on the internet.

  • sweetbiscuit says:

    I love this movie (heck, I love lamp) but it shouldn't have a sequel, much less a really expensive one. How about that comedic brain trust put their considerable weight behind some fun new ideas and scripts? Ya know, something NEW?

  • stretch65 says:

    Christina provides the BUNDY BOUNCE that made the movie...