Young actors are wonderful creatures, breezing -- or busting -- on to the landscape as if from nowhere, indulging us in the delight of discovery. But the twin pleasure of finding a new actor is watching an older one sidestep into territory you don't expect, becoming someone you'd never have thought he could be. That's where we're at with Brad Pitt, who has never been better than he is in Bennett Miller's Moneyball. As Billy Beane, the beleaguered Oakland A's general manager who turned his team around by thinking outside the Major League Baseball box, Pitt works wonders by seeming to do nothing at all.
I remember how many critics marveled over Pitt's super-actory turn in Twelve Monkeys, announcing it as a breakthrough in the evolving actor's career. Moneyball is a much bigger breakthrough, and one that's harder to pull off: Now that Pitt no longer has brash youth on his side, he's digging deeper and doing more with less. It's the kind of acting -- understated but woven with golden threads of movie-star style -- that gives us more to look at rather than less.
The picture is an adaptation of Michael Lewis's book Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game -- the script is by Steven Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin, from a story by Stan Chervin -- and even if you think you don't care about baseball, I'd urge you to give it a try. The true measure of Moneyball's effectiveness may have less to do with how well it works for baseball fans than for how it plays with people who wouldn't know a triple play if it whacked them upside the head. I fall into the latter camp, but I was delighted by Moneyball: The picture works as a classic American sports movie but also cuts a window into a much less glamorous pursuit, that of keeping an ailing business alive with creativity and open-mindedness.
As the picture opens, Pitt's Billy Beane, in the last game of the 2001 season, is reckoning with the loss of some of his best players; they've been wooed away the Yankees and the Red Sox, or, more specifically, by dazzling salaries he can't afford to pay. Later, he sits around a table with a bunch of old-timers who think they know how to find good players, though their criteria includes assessments of how good-looking the guys' girlfriends or wives are. (According to the decree of one of these wise-ass Tarot readers, an ugly girlfriend means a player lacks confidence.) Beane isn't buying their collective shtick -- he eyes them with bemusement and a faint glimmer of disgust as he spits chaw into his cup -- for reasons that later become clear: He himself was drafted by the Mets in the late '70s, lured with promises that weren't exactly broken and weren't exactly kept. (Miller reveals that backstory in artfully carved-out slices that reinforce the contemporary story without bogging it down.) A somewhat-chance encounter with a pudgy Yale graduate whose head is filled with stats, Jonah Hill's Peter Brand, nudges Beane toward a new way of thinking about building a team: Find unflashy -- and cheap -- players who can at least get on base and, if possible, turn their weaknesses into strengths. As Beane observes at one point, he can't replace one of his star players, but he can "rebuild him in the aggregate."
The brilliance of this approach is that while it would seem to be based on an obsession with numbers as opposed to people, it's exactly the opposite: The stats are merely a way of finding the flawed human greatness that can, perhaps perversely, help you win. Beane hires Brand away from the team he's working for, the Cleveland Indians, and sets him to work on reinforcing the raggedy A's. The old-timers -- including manager Art Howe, played by a supremely grouchy Philip Seymour Hoffman -- all think Beane is nuts and flagrantly defy him. But if you know anything about baseball, or even just about baseball movies, you can guess how this all turns out.
The marvel is that Miller still keeps you wondering how it will all turn out -- because even if you know, you don't really know, at least not in terms of where the story will take Beane. The picture has been shot, clearly with great care, by Wally Pfister (who often collaborates with Christopher Nolan but who has also done good, unflashy lens work on pictures like The Italian Job). At certain points, the golden stubble on Pitt's chin is lit as if it were a wheatfield in a Terrence Malick movie. But it all works. Pfister doesn't employ the tight closeup willy-nilly, and in some places, Pitt looks older, more worn-down, more laden with undereye baggage than he is in real life -- that's Beane's exhaustion and frustration speaking through his very skin.
But Pitt is careful not to play Beane as a suffering martyr. He balances the character's anxiety with freewheeling, impish skepticism. Pitt and Hill are terrific together: At first, when Beane and Brand are presenting their ideas to the doubting elders, Beane has to urge the timid Brand to jump in. But even then, the two have the wacky mind-meld of Bob and Ray -- they're like a comedy team whose timing is dictated by the music of the spheres instead of the old workaday beats, and it's wonderful.
Their connection is important because Beane is so often a man standing apart. Pitt knows how to play that kind of isolation without mawkishness. He was terrific in The Tree of Life, at least as good as any actor can be in Malick's bee-closeup universe. But he's even better here, both looser and more on-point. In one extraordinary, underplayed scene, Beane listens as his preteen daughter (played by the charming young actress Kerris Dorsey) sings a song for him while the two are out shopping for a guitar, a gift for her. Beane and his wife, played by the reliably solid Robin Wright, are divorced; she's remarried, he's not. (Be sure to watch for Spike Jonze in an uncredited, wicked little performance.)
Beane appears to be close to his daughter, but you can tell he doesn't see her as often as he'd like, or as often as he should. And the look on Pitt's face as he listens to that song -- a shadow of wonder and reckoning, as if everything else in the world could fall away at that moment and he wouldn't care -- has the sort of delicacy that a younger, greener actor wouldn't be able to pull off. In the past, Pitt has sometimes been a pretty but stiff performer, an heir to Robert Redford's wobbly gilded throne. But he's made a leap these past few years, right into his own golden age. When we see a new, young actor, we always wonder, What great thing will he do next? Now it's time, once again, to ask that of Pitt. It's even more exciting the second time around.