At last count White's review had absorbed 1,635 comments -- not all negative, and, in fairness, not all legitimate. Take these two erudite contributions, which were spammed hundreds of times each because, well, what the hell. it's the Web! We can!
Chaz SMITH on 09-29-2010 09:03 PM
You sick son of a bitch. F*ck you. F*CK YOU. GO ROT IN F*CKING HELL, YOU A**-SUCKING C*NT! GO ROT IN F*CKING HELL!
Ron P. on 09-29-2010 09:05 PM
YOU WANT THE ATTENTION ARMOND??
WELL HERE YOU GO.
ZANY YUCKERS. REPRESENT.
Indeed. But hundreds and hundreds more have accrued alongside these, all the more remarkable for the invective they've managed without even seeing the movie. Again, knowing what we know from this summer, let's not pretend to be surprised. Let's just luxuriate once more in others' rage and, if you like, the warm glow of superiority:
· You're not getting into heaven, you know that right?
· Just because you are entitled to an opinion doesn't mean your opinion should be heard. Hitler's opinion was that Jew's should be eradicated, and he had the right to his opinion.....doesn't mean anyone should have listened. Armond White's opinion (whether troll driven or not) is fine and dandy, but should not be featured on a movie review site that uses legitimate critics to come up with a consensus for a film. My opinion is not featured on this site because I am not a legit movie critic. Armond White's voice, in turn, should not be heard on this site.
· Armond White: the reason we will soon discover just how many comments can be posted in a thread before it crashes.
· I think it's hilarious that there are only SIX comments on the actual RT boards about the movie itself. Obviously, none of you actually care about the movie. Just about humping the leg of Armond White.
· WHY ARE YOU ALLOWED ON THIS F*CKING WEBSITE. You're totally one of those people who gives negative reviews to good movies and vise versa because you want to be different. Nobody judges someone who jumps on the band wagon, but really, you have fake opinions on movies so stop lying to yourself and the entire world you prick.
· Armond White is my father, and I have to take protestation to this effrontery of adolescent remonstration. He is an educated film critic, unlike most of these other so-called film critics on here that praise any popular film. If my father conjectures that The Social Network is specious, then it must be.
· DO NOT CLICK TO READ HIS FULL REVIEW. DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.
· Another review created using Mad Libs for Douchebags.
· he needs to be banned. not just because he disagrees with the T meter, but he never gets the point of the movie he watches. EVER
· everything he complained about is what makes this movie great! (or so i hear). how a guy who made a social revolution really lost is only true friends. This excuse that armond has made up is exactly why ill be seeing it this friday. secretly he really loved this movie, deep down inside his troll heart.
· OH NO! Someone gave a bad review to a movie I haven't seen yet! I AM TEH OUTRAGED!
· The negative review after this has more comments, f*ck Armond White he is old news. Lets hate on that ugly white broad instead. Down with Prairie Miller!
Oh, yes, her. 3,518 More Reasons to Love the Internet: Going Through Prairie Miller's Social Network Hate Mail, coming right up...
· The Social Network [Rotten Tomatoes]